Putting the Carapace MCP Connector Through Its Paces

Pillar: developer-tools

Why We Wrote This Post With a Tool, Not a Text Editor

This post exists to stress-test the Carapace MCP connector — every write path, every content element, and a couple of things it should refuse to do.

What the connector can create

The publishing steps, in order

  1. Create a draft branch
  2. Commit the initial content
  3. Preview the branch
  4. Make an edit
  5. Publish to main

Let's delve into how the underlying pipeline works — it's honestly a real game-changer for editorial workflows. See How Carapace Works for the full picture.

This post is written and published entirely through the Carapace MCP connector, with no manual repo edits.

Two of the tests below are expected to fail. That's the point — we're checking that validation actually blocks bad content instead of silently cleaning it up.

Code samples

interface DraftPost {
  slug: string;
  title: string;
  draft: boolean;
  tags: string[];
}

function summarize(post: DraftPost): string {
  return `${post.title} (${post.tags.join(", ")})`;
}
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Publish a draft once review is done
carapace preview mcp-capability-test
carapace publish mcp-capability-test

A picture, for good measure

Diagram showing a draft git branch being created from main, edited, then merged back into main during publish

Editorial status at a glance

Step Tool called Result
1 create_branch Draft branch created
2 create_post Initial content committed
3 preview Preview link returned